Estudio comparativo de plantas gastroprotectoras cultivadas en Perú y China
Date
2017-09-28
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
El presente estudio es tipo descriptivo - comparativo realizado en laboratorio, con el objetivo de establecer las semejanzas y diferencias entre las plantas gastroprotectoras cultivadas en Perú y China y, específicamente, determinar qué metabolitos secundarios son los posibles responsables del efecto gastroprotector. Para tal efecto, se usó el método de tamizaje fitoquímico y cromatografía en capa fina (CCF). Se trabajó con muestras de cinco plantas gastroprotectoras cultivadas en China: Glycyrrhiza uralensis F; Crataegus cuneata S; Artemisia scoparia W; Gardenia jasminoides E; Poria cocos W. y cinco plantas gastroprotectoras cultivadas en Perú: Piper angustifolium R (Matico); Aloe vera L (Sábila); Baccharis genisteloides L (Carqueja); Malva sylvestris L (Malva); Psoralea glandulosa L (Culén). Los resultados obtenidos mediante el tamizaje fitoquímico de las tinturas gastroprotectoras peruanas y chinas muestran la identificación de los siguientes metabolitos secundarios: 13 % derivados terpénicos (cadenas cíclicas), 11% flavonoides, 10 % cumarinas, 9 % saponinas, 8 % taninos y 5 % alcaloides, aproximadamente, arribando a la conclusión de que ambas plantas gastroprotectoras cultivadas en Perú y China tienen semejanzas en sus metabolitos. Asimismo, existen diferencias en las concentraciones de sus metabolitos y en la naturaleza y tipología de dichas plantas
The present study is a descriptive, comparative study carried out in the laboratory with the aim of establishing the similarities and differences between the gastroprotective plants cultivated in Peru and China and specifically determining which secondary metabolites are the possible responsible for the gastroprotective effect. For this purpose, the phytochemical screening and thin layer chromatography (TLC) method was used. We worked with samples from five gastroprotective plants cultivated in China: Glycyrrhiza uralensis F; Crataegus cuneata S; Artemisia scoparia W; Gardenia jasminoides E; Poria cocos W. And five gastroprotective plants cultivated in Peru: Piper angustifolium R (Matico); Aloe vera L (Aloe Vera); Baccharis genisteloides L (Carqueja); Malva sylvestris L (Malva); Psoralea glandulosa L (Culen). The results obtained by phytochemical screening of Peruvian and Chinese gastroprotective tinctures show that the following secondary metabolites are identified: approximately 13% terpenic derivatives (cyclic chains), 11% flavonoids, 10% coumarins, 9% saponins, 8% tinos and 5 % of alkaloids. Therefore, it is concluded that both gastroprotective plants cultivated in Peru and China have similarities in their metabolites
The present study is a descriptive, comparative study carried out in the laboratory with the aim of establishing the similarities and differences between the gastroprotective plants cultivated in Peru and China and specifically determining which secondary metabolites are the possible responsible for the gastroprotective effect. For this purpose, the phytochemical screening and thin layer chromatography (TLC) method was used. We worked with samples from five gastroprotective plants cultivated in China: Glycyrrhiza uralensis F; Crataegus cuneata S; Artemisia scoparia W; Gardenia jasminoides E; Poria cocos W. And five gastroprotective plants cultivated in Peru: Piper angustifolium R (Matico); Aloe vera L (Aloe Vera); Baccharis genisteloides L (Carqueja); Malva sylvestris L (Malva); Psoralea glandulosa L (Culen). The results obtained by phytochemical screening of Peruvian and Chinese gastroprotective tinctures show that the following secondary metabolites are identified: approximately 13% terpenic derivatives (cyclic chains), 11% flavonoids, 10% coumarins, 9% saponins, 8% tinos and 5 % of alkaloids. Therefore, it is concluded that both gastroprotective plants cultivated in Peru and China have similarities in their metabolites
Description
Keywords
Cromatografía capa fina, Metabolitos secundarios, Fitoterapia, Tamizaje fitoquímico, Tipología, Chromatography layer thim, Secondary metabolites, Phytotherapy, Phytochemical screening, Typology